Re: misc/49461: splusb is not included in spl(9) man page

[Ryo ONODERA <ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR misc/49461; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Ryo ONODERA <ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: misc/49461: splusb is not included in spl(9) man page
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 12:48:48 +0900 (JST)

 From: matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost>, Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:40:38 +1100
 
 > 
 > ryoon%NetBSD.org@localhost writes:
 >> >Number:         49461
 >> >Category:       misc
 >> >Synopsis:       splusb is not included in spl(9) man page
 > 
 > that's really the right thing.
 > 
 > all calls to splusb(9) indicate old drivers that need to be updated.
 > if anything, this info should be added to usbdi(9).
 
 Thanks for your information.
 Newer device drivers, for example, athn and axen still use splusb(9).
 Please add appropriate explanation in usbdi(9).
 And please note "do not use splusb" like sentence in spl(9) too.
 
 --
 Ryo ONODERA // ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost
 PGP fingerprint = 82A2 DC91 76E0 A10A 8ABB  FD1B F404 27FA C7D1 15F3