Thank you,I've had a try with tmpfs changes into 5.x, and it seems to fix most issues, but accedently not all - I've had one dead lock in tmpfs again some time ago. Due to my limited time and the massive changes in the fs-code and the way process notifications takes place between 5.x and 6.x, I've stopped working on it and started migration of all of our systems to 6.x. (Currently suspended due to the dead-lock-problem described in PR 48733.) My ufs patch to 5.x seems to be stable (of cause, it is ugly ...), but I think I've already send that one long time ago.
best regards W. Stukenbrock dholland%NetBSD.org@localhost wrote:
Synopsis: process deadlock (tstile) runing amanda sendsize - rename bug in tmpfs ??? State-Changed-From-To: feedback->open State-Changed-By: dholland%NetBSD.org@localhost State-Changed-When: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 05:46:03 +0000 State-Changed-Why: I think rmind was suggesting you should finish your patches to merge the fix into -5 :-) but I'll set it so it stops nagging you.