Re: kern/48579: #34490 (kernel compile fails in `le_isa_intredge', no 'le' in kernel config)

[Zbigniew <zbigniew2011%gmail.com@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR kern/48579; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Zbigniew <zbigniew2011%gmail.com@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: kern/48579: #34490 (kernel compile fails in `le_isa_intredge', no
 'le' in kernel config)
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 13:44:33 +0100

 2014-02-08 2:05 GMT+01:00, Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>:
 > The following reply was made to PR kern/48579; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >
 > From: Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>
 > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > Cc: tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost
 > Subject: Re: kern/48579: #34490 (kernel compile fails in `le_isa_intredge',
 >       no 'le' in kernel config)
 > Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 10:01:21 +0900
 >
 >  Your problem is not exactly same as #34490 (i.e. you got
 >  different undefined symbols in error messages), right?
 >  (it would always help to paste the exact errors you got)
 
 IIRC it were the same error messages - that's why I could find the
 former bug-report using Google - but having my kernel config you can
 easily verify this. Even, if they were a bit different - the bug was
 of the same nature.
 
 >  Probably your problem is that you leave "bicc0 at isa? ..." line
 >  while you comment out "le* at bicc?" line.
 
 I'm not sure, but maybe - still: does there exist any relationship
 between one and another? If BICC driver requires any headers, then it
 should load it by itself - not relying on other driver ("maybe this
 one is also selected, and the headers are already present").
 
 Besides: why such problems aren't verified and reported during neither
 of TWO former stages: "configure KERNEL", and "make depend"?
 
 And what about strange FireWire driver problems?
 -- 
 regards,
 Zbigniew