re: kern/47029: We need shm_open() and shm_unlink()

[matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR kern/47029; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: kern-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
    netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: re: kern/47029: We need shm_open() and shm_unlink()
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 16:16:52 +1100

 > From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
 > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > Cc: 
 > Subject: Re: kern/47029: We need shm_open() and shm_unlink()
 > Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 21:00:27 +0100
 > 
 >  On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 06:30:01PM +0000, David Holland wrote:
 >  >  Are these suitable for -6? (And if so, we'd probably better also get
 >  >  the various recent tmpfs fixes...)
 >  
 >  Releng usually has issues with changing/adding APIs to release branches.
 >  
 >  But without the tmpfs fixes, this definitively can not be pulled up - so,
 >  are the tmpfs fixes good for pullup?
 
 IMO, we should figure out what fixes we need for tmpfs for netbsd-6,
 and we should ignore posix shm for netbsd-6 (for the normal reasons.)
 
 
 .mrg.