Re: port-amd64/46413: 6.0-BETA fails to boot on system w/ >24 cores

[jnemeth%victoria.tc.ca@localhost (John Nemeth)]

The following reply was made to PR port-amd64/46413; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: jnemeth%victoria.tc.ca@localhost (John Nemeth)
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, port-amd64-maintainer%NetBSD.org@localhost,
        gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, 
dwhite%ixsystems.com@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: port-amd64/46413: 6.0-BETA fails to boot on system w/ >24 cores
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 23:10:46 -0700

 On Feb 16,  8:07am, David Holland wrote:
 }
 } The following reply was made to PR port-amd64/46413; it has been noted by 
GNATS.
 } 
 } From: David Holland <dholland-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
 } To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 } Cc: 
 } Subject: Re: port-amd64/46413: 6.0-BETA fails to boot on system w/ >24 cores
 } Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:57:09 +0000
 } 
 }  On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 11:15:04PM +0000, Doug White wrote:
 }   > From: Doug White <dwhite%ixsystems.com@localhost>
 }   > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 }   > Cc: 
 }   > Subject: Re: port-amd64/46413: 6.0-BETA fails to boot on system w/ >24 
cores
 }   > Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 14:57:36 -0700
 }   > 
 }   >  I built a kernel from a -current src tarball today and it booted =
 }   >  successfully. I used GENERIC, which has DIAGNOSTIC enabled. I assume =
 }   >  this enables the KASSERTs?=20=
 }  
 }  Yes.
 }  
 }  Now the question is, which change fixed it and can we get it into 6.1?
 
      I believe that 6.0 has the change to support 256 cores, so this
 problem has most likely already been solved.
 
 }-- End of excerpt from David Holland