NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: kern/46900: can't receive packets on wm interface



On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:35:00PM +0000, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
>       I have two on-board wm interfaces, one of which, wm0, is
>       somehow shared with a BMC, and the other of which, wm1, does
>       not appear to be shared with a BMC although it is hard to rule
>       that possibility out.  I can transmit and receive packets on
>       wm0, but I can only transmit packets on wm1: on the host with
>       wm1, I can see packets going out, but I see no packets coming
>       in; on its peer, I can see packets coming out, and I can see
>       packets going in, but the packets the peer transmits never
>       seems to get there.
> 
> wm0 at pci9 dev 0 function 0: Intel i82574L (rev. 0x00)
> wm0: interrupting at ioapic0 pin 16
> wm0: PCI-Express bus
> wm0: 256 word (8 address bits) SPI EEPROM
> wm0: Ethernet address 00:25:90:..:..:..
> ukphy0 at wm0 phy 1: OUI 0x000ac2, model 0x000b, rev. 1
> ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 
> 1000baseT-FDX, auto
> ...
> wm1 at pci10 dev 0 function 0: Intel i82574L (rev. 0x00)
> wm1: interrupting at ioapic0 pin 16
> wm1: PCI-Express bus
> wm1: 256 word (8 address bits) SPI EEPROM
> wm1: Ethernet address 00:25:90:..:..:..
> ukphy1 at wm1 phy 1: OUI 0x000ac2, model 0x000b, rev. 1
> ukphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 
> 1000baseT-FDX, auto
> 
>       I don't think this is a hardware problem because FreeBSD 9.0
>       can transmit and receive on both interfaces, although it
>       wouldn't surprise me if the brain-damaged crossing of wires
>       with the BMC to share ethernet ports is bollocksing the thing
>       up.

what does netstat -i show ?

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index