NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: bin/46782 (date -r overflows)



The following reply was made to PR bin/46782; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Michael Cheponis <Michael%Cheponis.Com@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: bin/46782 (date -r overflows)
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 16:45:01 -0700

 --f46d0447850f64e75b04c6b59608
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
 
 THANK YOU for your extra-rapid response, which is very clear and make very
 much sense.  I should have suspected it would have been taken care of, but,
 in the past, I've been encouraged to submit a pr if I don't with a little
 looking around see that the issue has been solved.
 
 Thanks again!
 
 (Also, I appreciate your volunteering for the project.  Sometimes
 volunteers don't know just how much we "in the field" appreciate all of
 your work.  I certainly appreciate it!)
 
 -Mike
 
 
 On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:45 PM, <jakllsch%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
 
 > Synopsis: date -r overflows
 >
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
 > State-Changed-By: jakllsch%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > State-Changed-When: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:45:24 +0000
 > State-Changed-Why:
 > This behavior is expected of all POSIX-like OSes with an int32_t time_t.
 > Furthermore, NetBSD switched to an int64_t time_t sometime after NetBSD-5,
 > where this particular overflow is gone.  The int64_t time_t change is too
 > invasive for backporting to NetBSD-5.  Your attention to detail is
 > appreciated.
 >
 >
 >
 >
 
 --f46d0447850f64e75b04c6b59608
 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 THANK YOU for your extra-rapid response, which is very clear and make very =
 much sense. =A0I should have suspected it would have been taken care of, bu=
 t, in the past, I&#39;ve been encouraged to submit a pr if I don&#39;t with=
  a little looking around see that the issue has been solved.<div>
 
 <br></div><div>Thanks again! =A0=A0</div><div><br></div><div>(Also, I appre=
 ciate your volunteering for the project. =A0Sometimes volunteers don&#39;t =
 know just how much we &quot;in the field&quot; appreciate all of your work.=
  =A0I certainly appreciate it!)</div>
 
 <div><br></div><div>-Mike</div><div><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On T=
 ue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:45 PM,  <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:jaklls=
 ch%netbsd.org@localhost" 
target=3D"_blank">jakllsch%netbsd.org@localhost</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<=
 br>
 <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
 x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
 Synopsis: date -r overflows<br>
 <br>
 State-Changed-From-To: open-&gt;closed<br>
 State-Changed-By: jakllsch%NetBSD.org@localhost<br>
 State-Changed-When: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:45:24 +0000<br>
 State-Changed-Why:<br>
 This behavior is expected of all POSIX-like OSes with an int32_t time_t.<br=
 >
 Furthermore, NetBSD switched to an int64_t time_t sometime after NetBSD-5, =
 where this particular overflow is gone. =A0The int64_t time_t change is too=
  invasive for backporting to NetBSD-5. =A0Your attention to detail is appre=
 ciated.<br>
 
 
 <br>
 <br>
 <br>
 </blockquote></div><br></div>
 
 --f46d0447850f64e75b04c6b59608--
 


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index