NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: bin/46782 (date -r overflows)
The following reply was made to PR bin/46782; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Michael Cheponis <Michael%Cheponis.Com@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc:
Subject: Re: bin/46782 (date -r overflows)
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 16:45:01 -0700
--f46d0447850f64e75b04c6b59608
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
THANK YOU for your extra-rapid response, which is very clear and make very
much sense. I should have suspected it would have been taken care of, but,
in the past, I've been encouraged to submit a pr if I don't with a little
looking around see that the issue has been solved.
Thanks again!
(Also, I appreciate your volunteering for the project. Sometimes
volunteers don't know just how much we "in the field" appreciate all of
your work. I certainly appreciate it!)
-Mike
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:45 PM, <jakllsch%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
> Synopsis: date -r overflows
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> State-Changed-By: jakllsch%NetBSD.org@localhost
> State-Changed-When: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:45:24 +0000
> State-Changed-Why:
> This behavior is expected of all POSIX-like OSes with an int32_t time_t.
> Furthermore, NetBSD switched to an int64_t time_t sometime after NetBSD-5,
> where this particular overflow is gone. The int64_t time_t change is too
> invasive for backporting to NetBSD-5. Your attention to detail is
> appreciated.
>
>
>
>
--f46d0447850f64e75b04c6b59608
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
THANK YOU for your extra-rapid response, which is very clear and make very =
much sense. =A0I should have suspected it would have been taken care of, bu=
t, in the past, I've been encouraged to submit a pr if I don't with=
a little looking around see that the issue has been solved.<div>
<br></div><div>Thanks again! =A0=A0</div><div><br></div><div>(Also, I appre=
ciate your volunteering for the project. =A0Sometimes volunteers don't =
know just how much we "in the field" appreciate all of your work.=
=A0I certainly appreciate it!)</div>
<div><br></div><div>-Mike</div><div><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On T=
ue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:45 PM, <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:jaklls=
ch%netbsd.org@localhost"
target=3D"_blank">jakllsch%netbsd.org@localhost</a>></span> wrote:<=
br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Synopsis: date -r overflows<br>
<br>
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed<br>
State-Changed-By: jakllsch%NetBSD.org@localhost<br>
State-Changed-When: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:45:24 +0000<br>
State-Changed-Why:<br>
This behavior is expected of all POSIX-like OSes with an int32_t time_t.<br=
>
Furthermore, NetBSD switched to an int64_t time_t sometime after NetBSD-5, =
where this particular overflow is gone. =A0The int64_t time_t change is too=
invasive for backporting to NetBSD-5. =A0Your attention to detail is appre=
ciated.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
--f46d0447850f64e75b04c6b59608--
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index