Re: kern/32626: ehci + umass + stress = umass stall cycle

["Martin S. Weber" <Ephaeton%gmx.net@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR kern/32626; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Martin S. Weber" <Ephaeton%gmx.net@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: kern/32626: ehci + umass + stress = umass stall cycle
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 23:15:54 -0500

 On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:55:01PM +0000, David Holland wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR kern/32626; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: David Holland <dholland-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
 > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > Cc: 
 > Subject: Re: kern/32626: ehci + umass + stress = umass stall cycle
 > Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 21:52:03 +0000
 > 
 >  On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 02:15:03PM +0000, Thomas Klausner wrote:
 >   >  On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 12:35:02PM +0000, Jonathan A. Kollasch wrote:
 >   >  > From: "Jonathan A. Kollasch" <jakllsch%kollasch.net@localhost>
 >   >  > To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 >   >  > Subject: Re: kern/32626: ehci + umass + stress = umass stall cycle
 >   >  > Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 06:34:26 -0600
 >   >  > 
 >   >  >  I have reproduced this bug within the last one to two years.
 >   >  
 >   >  Hm. I think from a GNATS point of view it's probably best if you
 >   >  submit a similar bug report referencing this one, otherwise I don't
 >   >  know how to get Martin out of the loop (who's probably not interested
 >   >  in all the details of this now).
 >  
 >  There is no useful way, at least for now. I'm not sure that creating a
 >  new PR is really the best solution though.
 
 If you still see this, keep it open and append, I don't mind the noise :)
 
 -Martin