Re: port-xen/44684: xen problem, pf problem domu

[gabberstudio <gabberstudio%mail.ru@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR port-xen/44684; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: gabberstudio <gabberstudio%mail.ru@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: port-xen/44684: xen problem, pf problem domu
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 16:07:48 +0300

 ² Sun,  6 Mar 2011 12:35:02 +0000 (UTC)
 Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost> ßØèÕâ:
 
 > The following reply was made to PR port-xen/44684; it has been noted
 > by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
 > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > Cc: port-xen-maintainer%NetBSD.org@localhost, 
 > gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost,
 >         netbsd-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, gabberstudio%mail.ru@localhost
 > Subject: Re: port-xen/44684: xen problem, pf problem domu
 > Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 13:33:42 +0100
 > 
 >  On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 12:30:04PM +0000, gabberstudio wrote:
 >  > The following reply was made to PR port-xen/44684; it has been
 >  > noted by GNATS.
 >  > 
 >  > From: gabberstudio <gabberstudio%mail.ru@localhost>
 >  > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 >  > Cc: 
 >  > Subject: Re: port-xen/44684: xen problem, pf problem domu
 >  > Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 15:26:35 +0300
 >  > 
 >  >  ÷ Sun,  6 Mar 2011 12:10:05 +0000 (UTC)
 >  >  Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost> ÐÉÛÅÔ:
 >  >  
 >  >  > The following reply was made to PR port-xen/44684; it has been
 >  >  > noted by GNATS.
 >  >  > 
 >  >  > From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
 >  >  > To: gabberstudio <gabberstudio%mail.ru@localhost>
 >  >  > Cc: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 >  >  > Subject: Re: port-xen/44684: xen problem, pf problem domu
 >  >  > Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 13:06:18 +0100
 >  >  > 
 >  >  >  On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 11:58:58AM +0300, gabberstudio wrote:
 >  >  >  > ? Sat, 5 Mar 2011 14:30:30 +0100
 >  >  >  > Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost> ?????:
 >  >  >  > 
 >  >  >  > > you mean, you still see the "Device not configured" when
 >  >  >  > > running pfctl ? Can you send you kernel config file ?
 >  >  >  > 
 >  >  >  > 
 >  >  >  > So will be more correct
 >  >  >  > 
 >  >  >  >     PF      
 >  >  >  > nano /etc/rc.conf
 >  >  >  > pf=YES
 >  >  >  > pflogd=YES
 >  >  >  > pflog_enable=YES
 >  >  >  > 
 >  >  >  > and
 >  >  >  >     KERNEL
 >  >  >  > nano /usr/src/sys/arch/i386/conf/XEN3PAE_DOMU
 >  >  >  
 >  >  >  in your original report you're talking about XEN3PAE_DOM0.
 >  >  >  Did you edit the right config file.
 >  >  >  please include the full uname -a output from the same machine
 >  >  >  you're running pfctl on.
 >  >  >  
 >  >  >  -- 
 >  >  >  Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
 >  >  >       NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
 >  >  >  --
 >  >  >  
 >  >  > 
 >  >  
 >  >  XEN3PAE_DOM0 The machine of problems has no.
 >  
 >  OK; but your problem report mentionned XEN3PAE_DOM0 in
 > "environnement", so this information was wrong.
 >  
 >  >  Problem by machine XEN3PAE_DOMU
 >  
 >  please post the output of "uname -a" on the domU then
 >  
 >  -- 
 >  Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
 >       NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
 >  --
 >  
 > 
 
 OMG/// As I could so to be mistaken, excuse me for a panic.
 It was necessary to palm off a kernel in DOM0