NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: kern/44568 (WAPBL doens't play nice with snapshots)
The following reply was made to PR kern/44568; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: hannken%NetBSD.org@localhost, kern-bug-people%NetBSD.org@localhost,
netbsd-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost,
gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: kern/44568 (WAPBL doens't play nice with snapshots)
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:49:13 +0100
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:16:32AM +0000, hannken%NetBSD.org@localhost wrote:
> Synopsis: WAPBL doens't play nice with snapshots
>
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: kern-bug-people->hannken
> Responsible-Changed-By: hannken%NetBSD.org@localhost
> Responsible-Changed-When: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:16:31 +0000
> Responsible-Changed-Why:
> I'm working on a fix.
thanks for your fixes, I couldn't make my test system panic any more.
But there's a strange thing:
I've been doing a
fssconfig -u fss0; rm /home/snaps/snap0; fssconfig fss0 /home /home/snaps/snap0
in a loop, while a bonnie++ was running in another loop. And I see:
/home: suspended 80.452 sec, redo 1217 of 2556
/home: suspended 226.932 sec, redo 1177 of 2556
/home: suspended 350.192 sec, redo 1206 of 2556
/home: suspended 477.433 sec, redo 1205 of 2556
/home: suspended 635.357 sec, redo 1208 of 2556
/home: suspended 813.420 sec, redo 1201 of 2556
any idea why is takes more and more time to take the snapshot ?
--
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index