Re: misc/44270: startup order for ntpdate and named is broken in 5.1

[Matthew Mondor <mm_lists%pulsar-zone.net@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR misc/44270; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Matthew Mondor <mm_lists%pulsar-zone.net@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: misc/44270: startup order for ntpdate and named is broken in
 5.1
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:53:17 -0500

 On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:20:04 +0000 (UTC)
 Bernd Ernesti <netbsd%lists.veego.de@localhost> wrote:
 
 >  Isn't ntpdate about to disapear which only leaves ntpd?
 
 =46rom my experience, ntpdate also has been very useful on systems where
 running ntpd is not wanted but a local ntp server already exists on the
 network...
 --=20
 Matt