Re: port-i386/38769 (MKMODULAR=yes should be the default on i386)

To: port-i386-maintainer%netbsd.org@localhost,netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,riz%NetBSD.org@localhost,jmcneill%invisible.ca@localhost
Subject: Re: port-i386/38769 (MKMODULAR=yes should be the default on i386)
From: riz%NetBSD.org@localhost
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:38:19 +0000 (UTC)

Synopsis: MKMODULAR=yes should be the default on i386

State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
State-Changed-By: riz%NetBSD.org@localhost
State-Changed-When: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 00:38:18 +0000
State-Changed-Why:
Submitter says to close

Prev by Date: Re: port-i386/38871 (vlans don't work on bge interface)
Next by Date: Re: xsrc/26271 (sessreg creates strange utmpx entries)
Previous by Thread: Re: port-i386/38769 (MKMODULAR=yes should be the default on i386)
Next by Thread: Re: kern/38798 (2nd CPU of a Core 2 duo CPU won't come ready)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index