Re: misc/30074 (proposed changes to RAIDframe related rc.d scripts)

[Greg Oster <oster%cs.usask.ca@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR misc/30074; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Greg Oster <oster%cs.usask.ca@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: riz%NetBSD.org@localhost, oster%NetBSD.org@localhost, 
misc-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost,
 netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, 
j+nbsd%2005.salmi.ch@localhost
Subject: Re: misc/30074 (proposed changes to RAIDframe related rc.d scripts)
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 08:37:24 -0600

 On Tue,  8 Jun 2010 23:35:54 +0000 (UTC)
 riz%NetBSD.org@localhost wrote:
 
 > Synopsis: proposed changes to RAIDframe related rc.d scripts
 > 
 > Responsible-Changed-From-To: misc-bug-people->oster
 > Responsible-Changed-By: riz%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > Responsible-Changed-When: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 23:35:54 +0000
 > Responsible-Changed-Why:
 > raidframe related, i'd like greg to see if it's valid.
 
 Yes, the idea is definitely valid, and even more appropriate now that we
 have the improved parity handling thanks to Jed Davis.  With Jed's
 changes, parity rebuilds are *much* faster, meaning that the admins are
 likely to be more willing to wait for the rebuilds/checks rather than
 needing to ge the system back in operation first.
 
 Later...
 
 Greg Oster