Re: bin/7249 (most section 2 man pages don't mention ESTALE)

To: gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,riz%NetBSD.org@localhost,sommerfeld%orchard.arlington.ma.us@localhost
Subject: Re: bin/7249 (most section 2 man pages don't mention ESTALE)
From: riz%NetBSD.org@localhost
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 03:37:55 +0000 (UTC)

Synopsis: most section 2 man pages don't mention ESTALE

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: riz%NetBSD.org@localhost
State-Changed-When: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 03:37:54 +0000
State-Changed-Why:
eight years seems long enough to wait for a "better" fix.

Prev by Date: xsrc/43433: X -configure coredumps with multiple module errors
Next by Date: Re: install/16131 (INSTALL.html doesn't give a path name for one-fs local install)
Previous by Thread: Re: bin/7249 (most section 2 man pages don't mention ESTALE)
Next by Thread: Re: kern/1354 (union FS can deadlock while vgone()/vclean() is running)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index