Re: port-arm/43339: IPL_NONE == IPL_SOFTNET on arm ports and it causes assertion panic

To: tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost, gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: port-arm/43339: IPL_NONE == IPL_SOFTNET on arm ports and it causes assertion panic
From: Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <rmind%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 03:03:35 +0100

tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost wrote:
> >Number:         43339
> >Category:       port-arm
> >Synopsis:       IPL_NONE == IPL_SOFTNET on arm ports and it causes assertion 
> >panic
>
> ...
>
> >Fix:
> Set proper IPL_SOFTfoo values?
> ...

Right, while from mutex(9) perspective IPL_NONE and IPL_SOFT* behave same,
part of the reason for these definitions is a use for various assertions.
Therefore, definitions should have unique values.

-- 
Mindaugas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: port-arm/43339: IPL_NONE == IPL_SOFTNET on arm ports and itcauses assertion panic
  - From: Izumi Tsutsui

References:
- port-arm/43339: IPL_NONE == IPL_SOFTNET on arm ports and it causes assertion panic
  - From: tsutsui

Prev by Date: Re: bin/43356 (bsd.subdir.mk: target <subdir> does not work)
Next by Date: Re: port-arm/43339: IPL_NONE == IPL_SOFTNET on arm ports and it causes assertion panic
Previous by Thread: port-arm/43339: IPL_NONE == IPL_SOFTNET on arm ports and it causes assertion panic
Next by Thread: Re: port-arm/43339: IPL_NONE == IPL_SOFTNET on arm ports and itcauses assertion panic
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index