re: misc/43348: driver(9) man page has strange examples

[matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost>]

>  >     const struct cdevsw foo_cdevsw {
>  >              int (*d_open)(dev_t, int, int, struct lwp *);
>  >              int (*d_close)(dev_t, int, int, struct lwp *);
>  >              ...
>  >     };
>  > 
>  > They should be like
>  > 
>  >     const struct cdevsw foo_cdevsw {
>  >             fooopen, fooclose, .....
>  >     };

actually, i'd much rather the example read something like:

        const struct cdevsw foo_cdevsw {
                .d_open = fooopen,
                .d_close = fooclose,
                ....
        };

and promote the use of named initialisers.


.mrg.