bin/43119: Incorrect flag order in mbrlabel(8) manpage

[bughunting%xs4all.nl@localhost]

>Number:         43119
>Category:       bin
>Synopsis:       Incorrect flag order in mbrlabel(8) manpage
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    bin-bug-people
>State:          open
>Class:          doc-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Sun Apr 04 19:50:00 +0000 2010
>Originator:     Bug Hunting
>Release:        5.99.25
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
The order of flags in the mbrlabel(8) manpage is incorrect, as they are not in
alphanumerical order.

(Background: both the current order and wording of the `-r' and `-w' flags were
committed in revision 1.13 as suggested in PR bin/13503; i don't believe
reversing the order of the two, as has happened then in comparison to
revision 1.12, was done on purpose with the ease of reading in mind.

The `-s' flag was added in revision 1.15, probably simply being put after `-r'.)
>How-To-Repeat:
"man 8 mbrlabel".
>Fix:
$ cd /usr/src/sbin/mbrlabel/; cvs diff -u mbrlabel.8
Index: mbrlabel.8
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/src/sbin/mbrlabel/mbrlabel.8,v
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -r1.16 mbrlabel.8
--- mbrlabel.8  12 Jan 2006 20:37:23 -0000      1.16
+++ mbrlabel.8  4 Apr 2010 19:48:17 -0000
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
 .\"
 .\"    $NetBSD: mbrlabel.8,v 1.16 2006/01/12 20:37:23 wiz Exp $
 .\"
-.Dd December 27, 2005
+.Dd April 4, 2010
 .Dt MBRLABEL 8
 .Os
 .Sh NAME
@@ -86,8 +86,6 @@
 Force an update, even if there has been no change.
 .It Fl q
 Performs operations in a quiet fashion.
-.It Fl w
-Update the in-core label if it has been changed.
 .It Fl r
 In conjunction with
 .Fl w ,
@@ -98,6 +96,8 @@
 Useful if the disk has remapping drivers on it and the MBR is located
 in a non-standard place.
 Defaults to 0.
+.It Fl w
+Update the in-core label if it has been changed.
 .El
 .Sh SEE ALSO
 .Xr disklabel 8 ,