Re: kern/41668 (MONOLITHIC should probably also be included in HEAD builds)

["Martin S. Weber" <Ephaeton%gmx.net@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR kern/41668; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Martin S. Weber" <Ephaeton%gmx.net@localhost>
To: Andrew Doran <ad%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Cc: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, tron%NetBSD.org@localhost, 
netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,
        gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, mm_lists%pulsar-zone.net@localhost
Subject: Re: kern/41668 (MONOLITHIC should probably also be included in HEAD 
builds)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 07:27:21 -0500

 On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:14:26AM +0000, Andrew Doran wrote:
 > On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 06:23:13AM +0000, tron%NetBSD.org@localhost wrote:
 > > Synopsis: MONOLITHIC should probably also be included in HEAD builds
 > > (...)
 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
 > > State-Changed-By: tron%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > > State-Changed-When: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 06:23:13 +0000
 > > State-Changed-Why:
 > > The MONOLITHIC is now built by default and distributed with snapshots.
 > > This should probably be undone after the release of NetBSD 6.0 if the
 > > problems with the module framework have been fixed in the meantime.
 > 
 > This should definitely be undone.  It confuses the needs of the producers
 > of the product with the needs of the consumers of the product.  
 
 Cannot mount sense in root argument.
 Error 79.
 Choose different root argument or explain, pls [?] :