Re: kern/41668 (MONOLITHIC should probably also be included in HEAD builds)

[Andrew Doran <ad%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR kern/41668; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrew Doran <ad%NetBSD.org@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: tron%NetBSD.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, 
gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
        mm_lists%pulsar-zone.net@localhost
Subject: Re: kern/41668 (MONOLITHIC should probably also be included in
        HEAD builds)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:14:26 +0000

 On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 06:23:13AM +0000, tron%NetBSD.org@localhost wrote:
 > Synopsis: MONOLITHIC should probably also be included in HEAD builds
 > 
 > Responsible-Changed-From-To: ad->tron
 > Responsible-Changed-By: tron%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > Responsible-Changed-When: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 06:23:13 +0000
 > Responsible-Changed-Why:
 > I'll handle this PR.
 > 
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
 > State-Changed-By: tron%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > State-Changed-When: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 06:23:13 +0000
 > State-Changed-Why:
 > The MONOLITHIC is now built by default and distributed with snapshots.
 > This should probably be undone after the release of NetBSD 6.0 if the
 > problems with the module framework have been fixed in the meantime.
 
 This should definitely be undone.  It confuses the needs of the producers
 of the product with the needs of the consumers of the product.  If the
 user base is so insignficant that these two sets of people are one and the
 same, then it's appropriate.  That would be rather sad.