NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: port-amd64/39283: Kernel crash on Dell Poweredge 2950



The following reply was made to PR port-amd64/39283; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: fredrik%netbsd.se@localhost
To: "Mindaugas Rasiukevicius" <rmind%netbsd.org@localhost>
Cc: fredrik%netbsd.se@localhost,
 gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,
 gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
 netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: port-amd64/39283: Kernel crash on Dell Poweredge 2950
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:02:08 +0100

 > Hello,
 >
 >>  > Synopsis: 4.99.71 crashed after about 3-4 days when running MP-kernel
 >>  >
 >>  > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 >>  > State-Changed-By: dsl%NetBSD.org@localhost
 >>  > State-Changed-When: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:49:43 +0000
 >>  > State-Changed-Why:
 >>  > Any further info ??
 >>
 >>  No more than the info that we put in the PR and on the mailing lists:
 >>
 >>  http://archive.netbsd.se/?ml=netbsd-current-users&a=2008-07&t=7775691
 >>  http://archive.netbsd.se/?ml=port-amd64&a=2009-02&t=9259482
 >>
 >>  The server crashed every 8'th day on SP-kernel and every 24'th hour
 >> with
 >>  MP-kernel. The problem has evolved with NetBSD releases, these days
 >> it's
 >>  "only" the filesystem that seems to hang and no i/o is possible without
 >>  reboot, if it runs to long without reboot is eventually crashed.
 >
 > Seems there is not yet enough information to figure out where bug is
 > hiding.
 > Also, it the only problem report with such symptoms, but if it is
 > happening
 > consistently and crashing the same way - unlikely to be a hardware
 > problem.
 >
 > http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-amd64/2008/12/19/msg000684.html
 >
 > Looking at the data from your email, there is callback_run_roundrobin()
 > which
 > calls a function pointer, but it is very unlikely to be NULL.  I have
 > added an
 > assert, "just in case":
 >
 > http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2009/11/24/msg003498.html
 >
 > Would you be able to try -current kernel, with that change in the link,
 > and
 > with the following debug options:
 >
 > options DIAGNOSTIC
 > options DEBUG
 > makeoptions DEBUG="-g -fno-omit-frame-pointer"
 >
 > Then repeat x/Lx and x/I dance again.  But no LOCKDEBUG option, as it
 > might
 > avoid some overhead and hopefully get stack dump a little bit more
 > readable.
 > Additionally, 'show uvm' output from DDB might be useful.
 >
 > Thanks.
 >
 > --
 > Mindaugas
 >
 
 Hi,
 
 Thanks for the response.
 
 We will try a current kernel tonight and report back with the result.
 
 Regards
 Fredrik
 
 


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index