Re: kern/41935: Addition to umass(4) man-page

[Jukka Ruohonen <jruohonen%iki.fi@localhost>]

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 04:50:03PM +0000, Matthew Mondor wrote:
>  That said, there are many devices that don't fully comply to the UMASS
>  protocol, which might explain such a list?  If we listed all working
>  devices, there might be several thousand to add I think...
>  

Perhaps such as "Kingston DataTraveler 2.0", a normal USB stick?

>  Should we keep adding every known to work device to that list?
>  Otherwise, should the currently very partial list be kept?

As long as there is a list, not populating it is a bug, in my opinion.

But agreed, a proposed alternative fix: get rid of the list altogether.