NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: lib/41931: log(-INFINITY) or log(-1.0) gives uexpected results
[[ re-send with the utf-8 replaced by ascii, so perhaps we avoid
base64-encoding the message... ]]
Hi,
more info on this. I think I've come a bit closer to understanding
what's happening.
According to lib/libm/Makefile, for non-vax hosts, a _MULTI_LIBM
is built, and it's of the _POSIX_MODE variety.
This means that lib/libm/src/w_log.c builds the "longer" version,
which looks like this:
double z;
z = __ieee754_log(x);
if(_LIB_VERSION == _IEEE_ || isnan(x) || x > 0.0) return z;
if(x==0.0)
return __kernel_standard(x,x,16); /* log(0) */
else
return __kernel_standard(x,x,17); /* log(x<0) */
...aand... __kernel_standard(x,x,17) brings us to:
case 17:
case 117:
/* log(x<0) */
exc.type = DOMAIN;
exc.name = type < 100 ? "log" : "logf";
if (_LIB_VERSION == _SVID_)
exc.retval = -HUGE;
else
exc.retval = -HUGE_VAL;
if (_LIB_VERSION == _POSIX_)
errno = EDOM;
else if (!matherr(&exc)) {
if (_LIB_VERSION == _SVID_) {
(void) WRITE2("log: DOMAIN error\n", 18);
}
errno = EDOM;
}
break;
and since we're not using the _SVID_ variant, -HUGE_VAL,
aka. -INFINITY is returned.
Now, I honestly don't quite know which variant of the POSIX standard
this library is supposed to conform to, but...
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/log.html
which is the IEEE Std 1003.1-2008 spec for log(), which says that
the intention is to be identical to ISO C. Anyway, the above
page says:
For finite values of x that are less than 0, [MX] [Option Start] or
if x is -Inf, [Option End] a domain error shall occur, and [MX]
[Option Start] either a NaN (if supported), or [Option End] an
implementation-defined value shall be returned.
Now, clearly we do support NaN.
And ISO C99 at
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n1256.pdf
section F.9.3.7 says:
log(x) returns a NaN and raises the "invalid" floating-point
exception for x < 0.
does not offer the option of returning an implementation-defined
value.
So why does the above code return -INFINITY instead of NaN?
Of course, introducing the following bit of code at the start of the
program fixes the problem:
_LIB_VERSION = _IEEE_;
With that, the test program prints what's expected.
Regards,
- Havard
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index