[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
The following reply was made to PR lib/25563; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: David Holland <dholland-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: lib/25563
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 03:28:11 +0000
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:50:04PM +0000, Andrew Doran wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 02:30:03PM +0000, Thomas Klausner wrote:
>>> I just tried the program from this PR on 5.99.8/amd64, and it said:
>>> ENTER: handler
>>> LEAVE: handler
Er. Yeah. Given that the program doesn't create any new threads, this
is clearly wrong, so what I wrote earlier is clearly bollocks. :-/
> We need thread local storage to sort it; TLS would be used for
What's supposed to happen if you use sigaltstack in a multithreaded
program anyway? Is the alternate stack supposed to be per-thread?
Because if so this is fairly easily fixed even without TLS, and if not
it's all nasal demons anyway and doesn't matter.
David A. Holland
Main Index |
Thread Index |