NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
bin/39719: block/inode typo in quotacheck(8)
>Number: 39719
>Category: bin
>Synopsis: block/inode typo in quotacheck(8)
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: bin-bug-people
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Wed Oct 08 14:55:00 +0000 2008
>Originator: Edgar Fuß
>Release: 4.0
>Organization:
Mathematisches Institut der Universität Bonn
>Environment:
>Description:
There is an obvious typo in quotacheck(8).
In update(), line 558 reads (indentation removed):
/*
* Reset time limit if have a soft limit and were
* previously under it, but are now over it.
*/
if (dqbuf.dqb_bsoftlimit &&
dqbuf.dqb_curblocks < dqbuf.dqb_bsoftlimit &&
fup->fu_curblocks >= dqbuf.dqb_bsoftlimit)
dqbuf.dqb_btime = 0;
if (dqbuf.dqb_isoftlimit &&
dqbuf.dqb_curblocks < dqbuf.dqb_isoftlimit &&
^^^^^^
fup->fu_curblocks >= dqbuf.dqb_isoftlimit)
^^^^^^
dqbuf.dqb_itime = 0;
dqbuf.dqb_curinodes = fup->fu_curinodes;
dqbuf.dqb_curblocks = fup->fu_curblocks;
where the marked "blocks" should clearly be "inodes".
It would also seem more logically to me to reverse the order of the last two
assignments to keep the blocks/inodes order consistent.
>How-To-Repeat:
less /usr/src/usr.sbin/quotacheck/quotacheck.c
>Fix:
567,568s/curblocks/curinodes/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index