Re: misc/39454: UPDATE build of amd64 bootcd fails to pick up new kernel

[Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR misc/39454; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
To: Havard Eidnes <he%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Cc: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, misc-bug-people%NetBSD.org@localhost, 
gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost,
        netbsd-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: misc/39454: UPDATE build of amd64 bootcd fails to pick up new 
kernel
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 20:52:21 +0200

 On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 08:48:34PM +0200, Havard Eidnes wrote:
 > >  > quattro: {108} /u/build/HEAD/tools/amd64/bin/nbmake-amd64 dependall
 > >
 > >  I think the right target for this would be "iso_image" and not 
 > > "dependall".
 > >  This is typically done after dependall have been run though the whole 
 > > tree.
 > ...
 > >  'build.sh release' will build a release, including binary sets and INSTALL
 > >  kernel with embeded ramdisk.
 > >  'build.sh iso-image' will take whatever exists in the sets directory and
 > >  build a cd image with it. It won't try to update kernels or binaries.
 > 
 > Is there a good reason the distrib/amd64/cdrom/ make target needs to
 > be different from the floppy targets in this respect?
 
 Yes, because it can't be done at the same time (it has to be run after
 release).
 
 > And why does
 > not "release" dump the built bits into the appropriate RELEASEDIR
 > subdirectory?
 
 I think it does, but maybe not when run from the distrib/ dir.
 
 -- 
 Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
      NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
 --