NetBSD-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

misc/39369: typo in select(2) man page: `effect', not `affect'



>Number:         39369
>Category:       misc
>Synopsis:       typo in select(2) man page: `effect', not `affect'
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    misc-bug-people
>State:          open
>Class:          doc-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Sun Aug 17 02:15:00 +0000 2008
>Originator:     Taylor R Campbell <campbell%mumble.net@localhost>
>Release:        NetBSD 4.0_STABLE
>Organization:
        
>Environment:
System: NetBSD smalltalk.localdomain 4.0_STABLE NetBSD 4.0_STABLE 
(RIAXEN3_DOM0) #2: Fri Jul 18 23:32:56 UTC 2008 
riastradh@smalltalk:/home/riastradh/netbsd/4/obj/sys/arch/i386/compile/RIAXEN3_DOM0
 i386
Architecture: i386
Machine: i386
>Description:

        The select(2) man page reads:
        
                To _affect_ a poll, the timeout argument should be
                non-null, pointing to a zero-valued...
        
        This should be:
        
                To _effect_ a poll, the timeout argument should be
                non-null, pointing to a zero-valued...

        There are no polls affected by passing a zero-valued timeout
        argument, but the effect of a poll may be had by passing such
        an argument; thus one effects a poll by passing a zero-valued
        timeout argument.

>How-To-Repeat:

        Type `man 2 select', and open your favourite English
        dictionary.

>Fix:

        Apply the following patch:

--- select.2    26 May 2008 15:25:58 +0000      1.33
+++ select.2    17 Aug 2008 01:05:11 +0000      
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@
 If
 .Fa timeout
 is a null pointer, the select blocks indefinitely.
-To affect a poll, the
+To effect a poll, the
 .Fa timeout
 argument should be non-null, pointing to a zero-valued timeval or timespec
 structure, as appropriate.



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index