NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: kern/38956
The following reply was made to PR kern/38956; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%shagadelic.org@localhost>
To: Christos Zoulas <christos%zoulas.com@localhost>
Cc: Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>,
gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost,
kern-bug-people%NetBSD.org@localhost,
gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost,
netbsd-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost,
martin%duskware.de@localhost
Subject: Re: kern/38956
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:11:01 -0700
On Jun 23, 2008, at 10:48 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> I agree. Portable bitfields though, not 'unsigned long int' ones.
> Also if I have to use BIG and LITTLE endian ifdefs to deal with
> the order that the bitfields are allocated, I'd rather use macros
> and masks. The code is cleaner that way.
Before you go changing it, talk to Matt about why it is that way.
>
>
> christos
-- thorpej
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index