NetBSD-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: kern/32318: NFS client or server hang
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 07:00:01PM +0000, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> >Number: 32318
> >Category: kern
> >Synopsis: NFS client or server hang
> >Confidential: no
> >Severity: serious
> >Priority: medium
> >Responsible: kern-bug-people
> >State: open
> >Class: sw-bug
> >Submitter-Id: net
> >Arrival-Date: Fri Dec 16 19:00:01 +0000 2005
> >Originator: Manuel Bouyer
> >Release: NetBSD 3.0_RC3
> >Organization:
> >Environment:
> System: NetBSD chassiron.antioche.eu.org 3.0_RC3 NetBSD 3.0_RC3 (CHASSIRON)
> #0: Sat Nov 26 15:11:16 CET 2005
> bouyer%pop.lip6.fr@localhost:/local/pop1/bouyer/tmp/sparc/obj/local/pop1/bouyer/netbsd-3/src/sys/arch/sparc/compile/CHASSIRON
> sparc
> Architecture: sparc
> Machine: sparc
> >Description:
> Setup: I get mail from various pop3 server via fetchmail and
> deliver to local folders (mbox format) via procmail, the folders are
> stored on a NFS server.
> fetchmail/procmail run on a x86 box (celeron 500) running a months-old
> current:
> NetBSD rochebonne.antioche.eu.org 3.99.7 NetBSD 3.99.7 (ROCHEBONNE) #1: Tue
> Aug 9 23:54:57 CEST 2005
> bouyer%pop.lip6.fr@localhost:/local/pop1/bouyer/tmp/i386/obj/local/pop1/bouyer/current/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/ROCHEBONNE
> i386
> The NFS server is a sparc IPX (40Mhz sparcv7).
>
> Problem: from time to time, the process accessing the files on
> the NFS server hang. This usually happens when the client does
> 2 concurent accesses to the mailboxes (e.g. reading a mailbox
> with mutt while procmail tries to deliver a mail to this mailbox).
> I've seen this also before the 3.0 branch was cut, with the NFS server
> running 2.0 or 2.1. I've never noticed this when the server was running
> 1.6.2 (it started happening when the server got upgraded).
I didn't see this since I upgraded the server to 4.99.62 (from 4.99.20 or
so), neither during normal usage nor when trying explicitely to reproduce it.
It's still be nice to have it fixed in netbsd-3 and netbsd-4, but at last
this seems to have gone in current, and hopefully it won't show up again in
netbsd-5 :)
--
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index