[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: PR/38141 CVS commit: src/sys
> One effect of this change: previously if an unmount failed, we would make a
> half hearted attempt to back out of it gracefully, but that was unlikely to
> work in a lot of cases. Now while an unmount that will be aborted is in
> progress, new file operations within the mount will fail instead of being
> delayed. That is unlikely to be a problem though, because if the admin
> requests unmount of a file system then s(he) has made a decision to deny
> access to the resource.
doesn't it break, say, amd(8)?
Main Index |
Thread Index |