Re: PR/38141 CVS commit: src/sys

[yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost (YAMAMOTO Takashi)]

>  One effect of this change: previously if an unmount failed, we would make a
>  half hearted attempt to back out of it gracefully, but that was unlikely to
>  work in a lot of cases. Now while an unmount that will be aborted is in
>  progress, new file operations within the mount will fail instead of being
>  delayed. That is unlikely to be a problem though, because if the admin
>  requests unmount of a file system then s(he) has made a decision to deny
>  access to the resource.

doesn't it break, say, amd(8)?

YAMAMOTO Takashi