[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: bin/32785 ([dM] du not terabyte-clean)
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 05:56:29PM +0000, der Mouse wrote:
>> Shortly after this PR was last updated, fts_number was changed to
>> int64_t. Does that solve the problem completely, or does du need
>> further tweaks internally?
> I expect that to fix it completely, though of course I'd have to test
> it to be truly certain (something I can't easily do, since I don't have
> a machine running -current, and certainly not one with that much disk
> on it).
Well, given that your old patch did fix it and both you and I think
this change should be equivalent (plus there was probably something on
tech-userlevel at the time, which I'm feeling too lazy to dig out
right now) I think we can call it fixed.
> There's also the possibility that something should be done to the 3.x
> and/or 4.x branches for this. Aside from that and the testing issue, I
> see no reason to keep the PR open.
It's in 4.0, and because it changes the libc ABI it's probably not a
good candidate for a 3.x pullup, although I can probably prepare one
if you or anyone else thinks it's worthwhile.
David A. Holland
Main Index |
Thread Index |