Re: port-i386/37193 (x86 pmap concurrency strategy could use improvement)

[yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost (YAMAMOTO Takashi)]

The following reply was made to PR port-i386/37193; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost (YAMAMOTO Takashi)
To: bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost
Cc: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, port-i386-maintainer%NetBSD.org@localhost,
        netbsd-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost, 
ad%NetBSD.org@localhost,
        port-xen%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: port-i386/37193 (x86 pmap concurrency strategy could use
 improvement)
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:15:26 +0900 (JST)

 > On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 08:01:52PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
 > > > Synopsis: x86 pmap concurrency strategy could use improvement
 > > > 
 > > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: port-i386-maintainer->yamt
 > > > Responsible-Changed-By: yamt%netbsd.org@localhost
 > > > Responsible-Changed-When: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:45:50 +0000
 > > > Responsible-Changed-Why:
 > > > i'll take a look.
 > > 
 > > here's a patch.  can anyone test it on xen+amd64?
 > 
 > You can't map the ptp read/write on Xen. But with this issue fixed,
 > it works fine. I used the attached patch on HEAD after the bouyer-xeni386
 > merge.
 > 
 > -- 
 > Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
 >      NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
 > --
 
 thanks.
 
 the #ifdef in pmap_map_ptp is the only necessary change?
 i don't want to investigate a diff of diffs. :)
 
 YAMAMOTO Takashi