Subject: Re: kern/36556: bd_size and bv_size in sys/dev/biovar.h is size_t, which may be only 32 bits.
To: None <kern-bug-people@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: Pavel Cahyna <pavel@NetBSD.org>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 11/08/2007 22:35:03
The following reply was made to PR kern/36556; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Pavel Cahyna <pavel@NetBSD.org>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: kern-bug-people@NetBSD.org, gnats-admin@NetBSD.org,
	netbsd-bugs@NetBSD.org, mhitch@NetBSD.msu.montana.edu
Subject: Re: kern/36556: bd_size and bv_size in sys/dev/biovar.h is size_t, which may be only 32 bits.
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 23:31:02 +0100

 On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:05:04PM +0000, John Nemeth wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR kern/36556; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: jnemeth@victoria.tc.ca (John Nemeth)
 > To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org, netbsd-bugs@NetBSD.org,
 > 	mhitch@NetBSD.msu.montana.edu
 > Cc: 
 > Subject: Re: kern/36556: bd_size and bv_size in sys/dev/biovar.h is size_t, which may be only 32 bits.
 > Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 14:02:07 -0800
 > 
 >  On Feb 24,  7:37am, David Holland wrote:
 >  } The following reply was made to PR kern/36556; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >  } 
 >  } From: David Holland <dholland+netbsd@eecs.harvard.edu>
 >  } To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
 >  } Cc: "Michael L. Hitch" <mhitch@NetBSD.org>
 >  } Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 14:25:10 -0500
 >  } 
 >  }  It helps to file such comments with gnats :-)
 >  }  
 >  }    --- Forwarded message ---
 >  }  
 >  }  From: "Michael L. Hitch" <mhitch@NetBSD.org>
 >  }  To: Juan Romero Pardines <xtraeme@netbsd.org>
 >  }  cc: source-changes@NetBSD.org
 >  }  Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev
 >  }  Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 10:34:47 -0700 (MST)
 >  }  
 >  }  On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Juan Romero Pardines wrote:
 >  }  
 >  }  >Module Name:	src
 >  }  >Committed By:	xtraeme
 >  }  >Date:		Fri Nov  2 08:37:06 UTC 2007
 >  }  >
 >  }  >Modified Files:
 >  }  >	src/sys/dev: biovar.h
 >  }  >
 >  }  >Log Message:
 >  }  >Make bd_size and bv_size u_quad_t rather than size_t, for large RAID
 >  }  >volumes. Reported a while ago by mhitch@.
 >  }  
 >  }  Note:  this fixes PR 36556.
 >  
 >       Does this require a pullup?
 
 done already.