Subject: Re: port-i386/36962: Misleading use of "path" in swapctl(8)'s discussion of -a option.
To: None <port-i386-maintainer@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: James Hartley <jjhartley@gmail.com>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 09/10/2007 20:45:02
The following reply was made to PR port-i386/36962; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "James Hartley" <jjhartley@gmail.com>
To: gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Cc: port-i386-maintainer@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,
	netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: port-i386/36962: Misleading use of "path" in swapctl(8)'s discussion of -a option.
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:43:13 -0700

 On 9/10/07, matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au> wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR port-i386/36962; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >  the manual already states in the 2nd paragraph of the
 >  DESCRIPTION:
 >
 >         If either special or node are not provided, the
 >         appropriate information is taken from the fstab(5) file
 >
 >  i see no reason to change swapctl(8).
 
 Searching for the word "special" on swapctl(8)'s manpage yields no
 results.  Again, I am looking at 4.0_RC1/i386.  It would be good if
 the above text actually was in the discussion found on the manpage.
 
 Jim