Subject: Re: kern/35351 (Re: CVS commit: src/sys/kern)
To: None <kern-bug-people@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: Elad Efrat <e@murder.org>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 04/07/2007 17:15:05
The following reply was made to PR kern/35351; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Elad Efrat <e@murder.org>
To: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>
Cc: tech-kern@netbsd.org, gnats-bugs@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/35351 (Re: CVS commit: src/sys/kern)
Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 20:12:57 +0200

 YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
 
 > is there a PR?
 
 no.
 
 > does veriexec serialize calls to fileassoc?
 
 given how veriexecctl works, I don't think it needs to.
 
 (I'm getting rather tired of this thread. if you think fileassoc is
 dangerous, fine, do whatever you like: disable it, disable veriexec,
 remove whatever code you want from the tree, I *really* don't care.
 I do think, however, that this will probably be a bigger disservice to
 the netbsd project and user community than you think, and suggest you
 try to take a look at what critical bugs netbsd-4 will ship with before
 you're blowing this issue beyond proportion. the only user of fileassoc
 in netbsd-4 which I'm willing to "back up" is veriexec, and given the
 ioctl() calls, triggering fileassoc_add(), happen in a userland "loop"
 in a single execution thread, I don't see a problem.)
 
 -e.