Subject: Re: kern/35196: sockets should die if addresses vanish
To: None <kern-bug-people@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: Martin Husemann <martin@duskware.de>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 12/08/2006 10:15:06
The following reply was made to PR kern/35196; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Martin Husemann <martin@duskware.de>
To: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
Cc: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>, gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org,
	kern-bug-people@NetBSD.org, gnats-admin@NetBSD.org,
	netbsd-bugs@NetBSD.org, Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
Subject: Re: kern/35196: sockets should die if addresses vanish
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:12:54 +0100

 On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 11:12:09AM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
 > Could it be added to route(1) instead?
 
 route(8) of course!