Subject: Re: bin/34979: -current libc causes boot failure
To: None <gnats-admin@netbsd.org, netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org, scotte@warped.com>
From: Scott Ellis <scotte@warped.com>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 11/12/2006 02:45:02
The following reply was made to PR bin/34979; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Scott Ellis <scotte@warped.com>
To: Christos Zoulas <christos@zoulas.com>
Cc: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org, gnats-admin@NetBSD.org,
	netbsd-bugs@NetBSD.org
Subject: Re: bin/34979: -current libc causes boot failure
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 18:44:36 -0800

 Christos Zoulas wrote:
 > On Nov 11,  3:58pm, scotte@warped.com (Scott Ellis) wrote:
 > -- Subject: Re: bin/34979: -current libc causes boot failure
 > 
 > | Thanks for the patch, but unfortunately there's no change at all with a 
 > | re-built userland.  Enabling syslogd results in the exact same behavior 
 > | as w/o this patch.
 > | 
 > | What additional steps can I take to help debug?
 > 
 > I did not think so. Can you ktrace it?
 
 I put three ktraces at 
 http://intrepid.warped.com/~scotte/visible/syslog_ktrace/ , and noted an 
 interesting behavior. The first time I execute syslogd after boot, it 
 produces the output shown in syslogd_Uses100PercentCPU.txt, while using 
 100% CPU (or close to it).  If I kill syslogd (-9 is the only signal 
 that works), it will restart and work perfectly fine, as shown in 
 syslogd_1.txt and syslogd_2.txt.
 
 I cannot get the system to hang, as I can when enabling syslogd on boot, 
 just use lots and lots of CPU.  This is the behavior that I saw before 
 in the Oct 24-ish -current (although the syslogd 100% cpu trick happened 
 occasionally, and the initial run at boot didn't seem to cause the problem).
 
 Let me know what else I can provide.  Thanks!
 
 	ScottE