Subject: Re: kern/32035: 3.0 MP machines can't keep time on busy nameservers
To: None <kern-bug-people@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: Tracy Di Marco White <nb-pr@gendalia.org>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 10/31/2006 07:50:02
The following reply was made to PR kern/32035; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Tracy Di Marco White <nb-pr@gendalia.org>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: kern-bug-people@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,
	netbsd-bugs@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/32035: 3.0 MP machines can't keep time on busy nameservers
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:45:32 -0600

 On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 01:25PM +0000, Matthias Scheler wrote:
 >The following reply was made to PR kern/32035; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >
 >From: Matthias Scheler <tron@zhadum.org.uk>
 >To: Hauke Fath <hf@spg.tu-darmstadt.de>
 >Cc: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
 >Subject: Re: kern/32035: 3.0 MP machines can't keep time on busy nameservers
 >Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:21:52 +0000
 >
 > On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 11:07:35AM +0100, Hauke Fath wrote:
 > > Am 28.10.2006 um 10:35 Uhr +0000 schrieb Frank Kardel:
 > > > Is this bug still valid after conversion to timecounters ? If not, can
 > > > we close it ?
 > >
 > > What did I miss? When has netbsd-3 been converted to timecounters?
 >
 > No, it hasn't. And it probably never will. So the answer is really
 > "Please update to NetBSD 4.0 after it has been released.".
 
 I don't care if we close this one.  I won't be able to test on work's
 production name servers til next summer, and I definitely hope we'll
 have 4.0 out long before that.  And if we still can't keep time, I'll
 reopen it.
 
 -Tracy