perry@piermont.com wrote:

> >  Please post individual bugs/fixes which you can confirm.
> 
> I can't confirm them without doing the port, at which point why would
> I need to post them? :)

Otherwise this PR will never be closed and makes no sense, I'm afraid.

> Clearly the fix that prevents certain versions of the card from
> screwing up hardware assisted checksums is important.

Only this? Or more other 8139C+ fixes?
Is it a good idea to pull all fixes blindly?

Anyway please also see recent posts on tech-kern and tech-net.
yamt said that hw ip4csum bug only happens with
very small packet (less than ETHER_PAD_LEN) so FreeBSD's
fix is not right. Furthermore, they choose to copy small packets
to a new mbuf for padding, and several people object it.
---
Izumi Tsutsui