The following reply was made to PR bin/15251; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: John Nemeth <jnemeth@victoria.tc.ca>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: gnats-admin@NetBSD.org, netbsd-bugs@NetBSD.org, woods@planix.com
Subject: Re: bin/15251 (/dev/dty?? devices, using puc driver, do not work properly with 'cu')
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 12:22:17 -0800 (PST)

    From: "Greg A. Woods" <woods@weird.com>
    Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 20:40:02 +0000 (UTC)
 
    The following reply was made to PR bin/15251; it has been noted by GNATS.
 
    From: "Greg A. Woods" <woods@weird.com>
    To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
    Cc: elad@netbsd.org
    Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:38:32 -0400
 
     At Sat,  7 Oct 2006 18:18:29 +0000 (UTC),
     elad@netbsd.org wrote:
     >
     > Synopsis: /dev/dty?? devices, using puc driver, do not work properly with 'cu'
     >
     > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
     > State-Changed-By: elad@netbsd.org
     > State-Changed-When: Sat, 07 Oct 2006 18:18:28 +0000
     > State-Changed-Why:
     > cu was recently replaced with tip
 
     cu(1) is still included in supported versions of NetBSD.  It would be
     still be very nice if it worked properly.
 
      I have re-opened the PR, since you are right that PRs can be
 filed against any supported version.
 
     Furthermore you can't really just replace cu(1) with tip(1) -- they have
     quite different uses and tip(1) is severely deficient in several
     important ways.
 
      tip(1) in -current has been upgraded to have all the features of
 cu(1).  Are you aware of any that might be missing?