> Well, it's quite a bit more than doing a "build.sh ... release"
> and follow that with "build.sh ... iso-image", which is what I
> can do for i386.  ...plus using src/distrib/cdrom introduces
> local changes in my source tree, which must be re-done if I want
> to do this for another port.

My point is:
Why do we have to maintain two independent infrastructures
(src/etc/etc.* and src/distrib/cdrom) for the same iso target?

Isn't it better to modify src/distrib/cdrom/Makefile etc.
to handle iso-image target of build.sh?
---
Izumi Tsutsui