The following reply was made to PR port-i386/33492; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Matthias Drochner <M.Drochner@fz-juelich.de>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: port-i386-maintainer@NetBSD.org, gnats-admin@NetBSD.org,
	netbsd-bugs@NetBSD.org, abrasive@axdf.net
Subject: Re: port-i386/33492: wi(4) crash 
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 09:44:17 +0200

 abrasive@axdf.net said:
 >  >  > pcic0: port 0x300-0x30f 
 > pcic0: port 0x400-0x43f
 
 Sorry, I did copy & paste the wrong line. I wanted to
 cite the line with 0x400.
 
 What I suspect is that the addresses 0x400+ are not usable, either
 because used by some other device, or due to aliasing.
 (It is just above the 10-bit boundary.)
 
 The pcic@isa code tries to find out whether only 10 bits
 are decoded and selects the io range 300+ or 400+
 accordingly. What I don't understand is why the first socket
 gets a 300 address and the second a 400. Something must
 override the initial range.
 You could try some PCMCIOVERBOSE and PCICDEBUG options to
 get some more information.
 
 best regards
 Matthias