abrasive@axdf.net said:
>  >  > pcic0: port 0x300-0x30f 
> pcic0: port 0x400-0x43f

Sorry, I did copy & paste the wrong line. I wanted to
cite the line with 0x400.

What I suspect is that the addresses 0x400+ are not usable, either
because used by some other device, or due to aliasing.
(It is just above the 10-bit boundary.)

The pcic@isa code tries to find out whether only 10 bits
are decoded and selects the io range 300+ or 400+
accordingly. What I don't understand is why the first socket
gets a 300 address and the second a 400. Something must
override the initial range.
You could try some PCMCIOVERBOSE and PCICDEBUG options to
get some more information.

best regards
Matthias