Subject: Re: port-i386/31494
To: None <port-i386-maintainer@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 10/12/2005 18:31:02
The following reply was made to PR port-i386/31494; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: port-i386-maintainer@NetBSD.org, gnats-admin@NetBSD.org,
	netbsd-bugs@NetBSD.org
Subject: Re: port-i386/31494
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 20:29:55 +0200

 On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:20:02PM +0000, Eric Gendron wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR port-i386/31494; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: Eric Gendron <ericg@conceptid.ca>
 > To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
 > Cc: 
 > Subject: Re: port-i386/31494
 > Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 18:12:49 -0400
 > 
 >  I try FreeBSD 5.0Beta and compile SMP kernel, that's work without any
 >  other modifications.
 >  
 >  So it's probably not an interrupt routing problem...
 
 It's not relevant. The kernel does the interrupt routing, so this would
 just prove that FreeBSD can do proper interrupt routing on this system,
 while NetBSD doesn't. This may be fixed by some interrupt-specific
 option in the kernel config.
 
 -- 
 Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
      NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
 --