Am 24.06.2005 um 14:52 Uhr +0200 schrieb Hauke Fath:
>(1) 'obsolete'? The newfs(8) '-a' option has code behind it. Remove 
>that code (and I'd argue you shouldn't), and _then_ remove the man 
>page entry. In that sequence, exactly, *not* the other way round. In 
>what way is an option to define the physical layout of a filesystem 
>obsolete, btw.?

If any, you could have _added_ a remark that the maxcontig parameter 
is considered obsolete (wrt RAID layout, it is not, IMO), instead of 
_replacing_ a perfectly valid and clear explanation with a null 
sentence.

	hauke

-- 
/~\  The ASCII Ribbon Campaign                    Hauke Fath
\ /    No HTML/RTF in email	        Institut für Nachrichtentechnik
  X     No Word docs in email	                  TU Darmstadt
/ \  Respect for open standards              Ruf +49-6151-16-3281