On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 09:56:02PM +0000, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>  That was the only justification for the pointless remarks made by your
>  associates earlier this week.

How were they pointless? That your Makefile isn't POSIX-compliant
and that NetBSD's make may or may not be POSIX-compliant have nothing
to do with each other. Just fix your makefile and be done with it; I
don't know why you're so intent on finding a problem with NetBSD's
make. There is no problem. The problem is in your makefile.

Please close this PR.
-- 
Name: Dave Huang         |  Mammal, mammal / their names are called /
INet: khym@azeotrope.org |  they raise a paw / the bat, the cat /
FurryMUCK: Dahan         |  dolphin and dog / koala bear and hog -- TMBG
Dahan: Hani G Y+C 29 Y++ L+++ W- C++ T++ A+ E+ S++ V++ F- Q+++ P+ B+ PA+ PL++