The following reply was made to PR misc/30175; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Alan Barrett <apb@cequrux.com>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org, netbsd-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: misc/30175: (pf)spamd manpages inaccurate and erroneous
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 15:22:09 +0200

 On Mon, 16 May 2005, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
 > are you proposing to rename binaries in the most of packages?
 > i don't think it belongs to this PR.
 
 I do think that binaries should be renamed in most of the packages,
 but I agree that doing so does not belong in this PR.
 
 The name of the (pf)spamd executable does belong in this PR, and I
 made the general argument (about other packages) simply to support my
 position about how (pf)spamd should be named.
 
 --apb (Alan Barrett)