hi,

> > (assuming that people don't care its name unless it's in base :-)
> 
> Please do not make a (pf)spamd package that conflicts with the
> mail/spamassassin package.
> 
> More generally, even if there is no conflict (yet), I wish that packages
> that installed many executables would use a common prefix to name
> them all.  Do not have the "foo" package install bin/foo, bin/bar
> and bin/baz, where bar and baz are things that ordinary users of the
> foo package will be unlikely to care about, or where the names are
> likely to conflict with other packages in the future; instead have the
> "foo" package install bin/foo, bin/foo-bar and bin/foo-baz; or perhaps
> bin/foo, libexec/foo/bar and libexec/foo/baz.

are you proposing to rename binaries in the most of packages?
i don't think it belongs to this PR.

YAMAMOTO Takashi