Subject: Re: kern/28582
To: None <augustss@netbsd.org>
From: Chris Tribo <ctribo@dtcc.edu>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 04/29/2005 15:00:05
On Apr 29, 2005, at 2:25 PM, augustss@netbsd.org wrote:

> First, is the USB keyboard the console keyboard (look in the boot  
> message)?

I believe so... though it doesn't say "console keyboard" like pckbd,  
matter of fact, pckbdc is not attached period. I guess that's not  
surprising since it doesn't physically exist.

Apr 29 09:10:26 atlantis /netbsd: wsdisplay0 at vga0 kbdmux 1:  
console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
Apr 29 09:10:26 atlantis /netbsd: wsmux1: connecting to wsdisplay0
Apr 29 09:10:26 atlantis /netbsd: ehci0: handing over low speed  
device on port 3 to uhci1
Apr 29 09:10:26 atlantis /netbsd: uhub4: port 3, device disappeared  
after reset
Apr 29 09:10:26 atlantis /netbsd: ehci0: handing over low speed  
device on port 4 to uhci1
Apr 29 09:10:26 atlantis /netbsd: uhub4: port 4, device disappeared  
after reset
Apr 29 09:10:26 atlantis /netbsd: uhidev0 at uhub1 port 1  
configuration 1 interface 0
Apr 29 09:10:26 atlantis /netbsd: uhidev0: DELL DELL USB Keyboard,  
rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2, iclass 3/1
Apr 29 09:10:26 atlantis /netbsd: ukbd0 at uhidev0: 8 modifier keys,  
6 key codes
Apr 29 09:10:26 atlantis /netbsd: wskbd0 at ukbd0 mux 1
Apr 29 09:10:26 atlantis /netbsd: wskbd0: connecting to wsdisplay0
Apr 29 09:10:26 atlantis /netbsd: uhidev1 at uhub1 port 1  
configuration 1 interface 1
Apr 29 09:10:26 atlantis /netbsd: uhidev1: DELL DELL USB Keyboard,  
rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2, iclass 3/0
Apr 29 09:10:26 atlantis /netbsd: uhidev1: 2 report ids
Apr 29 09:10:26 atlantis /netbsd: uhid0 at uhidev1 reportid 1:  
input=1, output=0, feature=0
Apr 29 09:10:26 atlantis /netbsd: uhid1 at uhidev1 reportid 2:  
input=3, output=0, feature=0

-bash-3.00# wsmuxctl -f 0 -l
wsmouse0
-bash-3.00# wsmuxctl -f 1 -l
wskbd0
-bash-3.00# wsconsctl -a
type=usb
...
encoding=us


> Second, does it help to use "flags 1"  for the USB controller in  
> the kernel
> config file (assuming the answer to the first question is yes).

Not sure yet.

> !DSPAM:42727c05170967308919811!