Subject: Re: kern/29660: vlans broken on bge(4)
To: None <kern-bug-people@netbsd.org, gnats-admin@netbsd.org,>
From: Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk>
List: netbsd-bugs
Date: 03/12/2005 19:50:02
The following reply was made to PR kern/29660; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk>
To: gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Cc: kern-bug-people@NetBSD.org, gnats-admin@NetBSD.org,
	netbsd-bugs@NetBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/29660: vlans broken on bge(4)
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 19:49:25 +0000

 [strangely I didn't receive Manuel's comment via email, but by checking
 the gnats database.. Shouldn't it be sent on automatically?]
 
 Anyway, bge(4) knows about vlans, so it doesn't have the "can't cope with
 the extra 4 bytes so reduce mtu" problem. Both bge and vlan interfaces
 are set to 1500.
 
 Doing the above test on the same machine with a 3com 3c905cx-tx-m gets
 4.6MB/s in both configurations, ie, it doesn't matter whether or not we
 are tagging.
 
 Funnily enough, I get the same result (4.6MB/s in both cases) for an old
 realtek card on an ancient laptop. rtk doesn't understand vlans, so the
 vlan interface has a lower mtu, but this didn't make the interface noticably
 slower in my primitive test. We aren't talking fractions of second here!