The following reply was made to PR kern/29544; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: john heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
To: Martin Husemann <martin@duskware.de>
Cc: john heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>, thorpej@netbsd.org,
	gnats-bugs@NetBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/29544
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 18:43:59 +0000

 Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 07:24:30PM +0100, Martin Husemann:
 > I'll attach some pkt traces - maybe this helps. The log from the server say
 > "bad cksum 0" (as expected, right?)
 
 right, it will be zero when BPF gets it.  in fact, afaik, the mbuf will never
 be updated as I believe, like hme/gem, the checksum is done its way to the
 transmit buffer.
 
 > but the client says "bad cksum ffff", and
 > that probably is not ok.
 
 heh, right.  sorry.
 
 I have to head out, but I'll look at it when I get back.